Bluehost and BulwarkHost are two hosting services where you can start small and grow your way to a popular, lucrative website. The question is which of these two hosting services are right for you. Here, in our Bluehost vs BulwarkHost web host comparison, are the facts that we have found for both companies so you can make an informed decision before you commit.
Bluehost vs BulwarkHost – Performance
As far as reliability goes, BulwarkHost and Bluehost both offer the standard 99.9% uptime guarantee. It’s not great, but it’s not terrible either. 99.94% is the average in the industry, so their guarantees put them within the range of that.
BulwarkHost is a little faster than Bluehost overall. Bluehost has page load times of 1.4 seconds, while BulwarkHost averages 1.05 seconds because of their LiteSpeed servers. If you have to choose one of these hosts on performance alone, choose BulwarkHost to get the faster hosting.
BulwarkHost vs Bluehost – Pricing & Features
Both BulwarkHost and Bluehost focus on offering cheap hosting for start-up websites. BulwarkHost puts a cap on their disk space and bandwidth, possibly due to the SSD (solid state drives) on their servers. While SSD hard drives are much faster, they are usually smaller than a regular hard drive. However, the limits are not restricting. You’ll have room to grow before having to pay more for resources.
Bluehost offers their resources as unmetered, which means that the normal amount of traffic for a typical website won’t have a problem. If you go over what they consider normal, they’ll either suspend your account or push you to upgrade your services.
| Hosting Company | Price Range/Month | Domains | Disk Space (min. to max.) | Bandwidth (min. to max.) |
| Bluehost | $2.95-$14.99 | 1 to Unlimited | 50GB to Unlimited | Unmetered |
| BulwarkHost | $3.56-$14.75 | Unlimited | 3GB to 15GB | 150GB to 750GB |
While fairly even on pricing, Bluehost offers more space and bandwidth overall.
Bluehost vs BulwarkHost – Security
Bluehost offers the most basic of security features. If you want SSL or other security options, such as SiteLock, you’ll have to pay extra for them. Not only does BulwarkHost offer the standard security, but they also have Cloud Linux servers, which assign different CPU allocations to every account on the server. That way, if one site on the server is attacked, the others are safe.
Both hosts have automatic daily backups and CloudFlare, which speeds up the server while protecting from DDoS attacks. If you want free SSL though, BulwarkHost offers that for free with some plans.
BulwarkHost vs Bluehost – Usability
To make web hosting easy to use for customers, most web hosting services offer standard features such as a cPanel administration back end, 1-click installer marketplaces and FTP access. Bluehost and BulwarkHost are not different. The main features that stand out are Bluehost’s enhanced cPanel, created to make it easier to use and a little prettier to look at, and BulwarkHost’s email forwarding and auto-responder options. In usability, these hosts are pretty evenly matched, but if you’re looking for email options without a 3rd-party solution, BulwarkHost is the way to go.
Bluehost vs BulwarkHost – Customer Service
Bluehost has 24/7/365 technical support via phone, email, chat, and their handy ticket system. They also offer the standard 30-day money back guarantee. However, reviews of their customer service are poor no matter where you look. Customers complain about 45-minute wait times and subpar service.
BulwarkHost’s reviews are not nearly as damaging. Their customer service is also 24/7/365, but it is mainly done through their ticket system. The also offer the 30-day money back guarantee.
But, besides the customer service reviews, the biggest difference is BulwarkHost’s free backup restoration services and free website migration assistance, making BulwarkHost stand out above Bluehost.
BulwarkHost vs Bluehost – Pros & Cons
Bluehost
Here are some interesting pros and cons for Bluehost:
Pros
- Low starting price
- CloudFlare
- Room to grow
- Official WordPress host
Cons
- Extras are costly
- Subpar customer service
- No definite resource limitations
BulwarkHost
Now take a look at the highlights for BulwarkHost:
Pros
- Cloud Linux servers with LiteSpeed
- Resource limitations written in stone
- Free SSL for some plans
- Free migration
Cons
- Limiting disk space
- Support limited to ticket system
Bluehost vs BulwarkHost – Rating
| Hosting Company | Performance | Features | Prices | Security | Usability | Customer Support |
| Bluehost | 6/10 | 8/10 | 9/10 | 9/10 | 9/10 | 4/10 |
| BulwarkHost | 7/10 | 7/10 | 9/10 | 9/10 | 10/10 | 8/10 |
Verdict
Bluehost and BulwarkHost are fairly similar in all of these categories, but BulwarkHost pulls ahead in speed, usability and customer service. If you’re looking for a web host to start and grow your online presence, BulwarkHost is the perfect fit for you.
Do you have questions about these hosting services? Have you worked with one of them before? Share your questions and comments below.