0

A2Hosting vs FatCow Web Hosting Comparison

by Jerry ClarkApril 24, 2018

A2Hosting is a hosting platform that tends to target advanced users. FatCow is a host with a unique green spin on hosting. Both are in the business of finding new customers, and both are good choices for those looking to build a website. The purpose of this A2Hosting vs FatCow review is to compare the two services by looking at performance, features, price, customer service, security, and usability to determine which one is the more suited to your needs.

A2Hosting vs FatCow – Performance

A2Hosting is a technical marvel. It’s not just that downtime is unheard of with the host, but that it provides a level of speed you really shouldn’t get for the price. FatCow, on the other hand, doesn’t do anything special with its tech. In fact, it’s suffered some significant downtime fairly recently and it doesn’t look like the company has done very much to make sure it won’t happen again. This is a case where one of the parties is just head and shoulders above the competition – if your goal is to get the best performance with the fewest problems, A2Hosting is the host for you.

You Might Also Like Our A2Hosting vs SquareSpace Web Hosting Comparison

A2Hosting vs FatCow – Prices & Features

A2Hosting is a service aimed at power users, with a host of great tools and a level of tech that’s hard to match in the industry. FatCow, on the other hand, is a cheap and simple service that targets users who really care about the environment. While FatCow’s services might not be anything to write home about, their green solutions to hosting really make it something special. A2Hosting has to compete simply by upping what you can get for your money. Who’s the winner? It depends on what you consider a value. If you’re looking solely at the price tag, A2Hosting does take the point.

Hosting CompanyPrice Range/MonthDomainsDisk Space (min. to max.)Bandwidth (min. to max.)
A2Hosting$3.92 – $99.595 to UnlimitedUnlimitedUnlimited
FatCow $49 per year1UnlimitedUnlimited

A2Hosting vs FatCow – Security

Both of these hosts provide a decent security experience with better security options available for a nominal fee. It’s very standard in the industry to do security this way now, even if it’s tough to see something vital as an up-charge on your bill. The two services are so close, in fact, that you couldn’t give the nod to either if you were looking at security alone. The reason that FatCow tends to win in this contest is less because of security and more because of data back-ups. A2Hosting doesn’t really have anything special, while FatCow will provide users with a fantastic daily backup service for a fee. While the extra charge isn’t great, the fact that it is available really gives the edge to FatCow.

A2Hosting vs FatCow – Usability

This is a fairly tough category to judge because both of these services are well known for being a bit difficult to use. A2Hosting has the huge disadvantage of hiding some of its best services behind menus and options that novices aren’t likely to use, while FatCow commits the cardinal sin of not using cPanel. As such, it might be fair to call this one a tie – A2Hosting picks up the nod for being much more usable for those who have built sites in the past, while FatCow is better for those who are coming into the experience with little or no experience.

A2Hosting vs FatCow – Customer Service

While there is a winner here, it’s important to note that neither of these hosts provides bad customer service. FatCow provides exactly what you’d expect a hosting company to give you, along with a very nice live chat feature that helps to resolve a few minor problems very quickly. A2Hosting, on the other hand, does all that plus it has a reputation for being exceedingly friendly. It’s not that FatCow is bad, but rather that it does nothing special. A2Hosting steps things up a few notches and gives users a much better experience for their money. A2Hosting wins this category handily.

A2Hosting vs FatCow – Pros & Cons

A2Hosting

Pros:

  • Speed is far better than average;
  • Very friendly customer service with multiple options;
  • Almost zero downtime;
  • Security options are good;
  • Power users have plenty of options from which to choose;
  • Set-up is remarkably easy;

Cons:

  • Very difficult for new users;
  • Too many security up-sells;
  • Too much up-selling in general;
  • Pricing structure hides some surprises;
  • Self-support really needs an overhaul;

FatCow

Pros:

  • Commitment to being green is no joke;
  • Customer service is quite reliable;
  • Has a single, reasonable price point;
  • Easy to use if you’ve never worked with a hosting platform before;

Cons:

  • Lack of cPanel is incredibly frustrating;
  • Slow speeds;
  • Has had downtime with no guarantee of changing;
  • Best security options require more money;
  • Lack of monthly plans for those on the fence;

A2Hosting vs FatCow – Rating

Hosting CompanyPerformanceFeaturesPricesSecurityUsabilityCustomer Support
A2Hosting9/107/107/108/106/109/10
FatCow 3/107/109/107/106/108/10

Verdict

FatCow and A2Hosting really couldn’t be more different. FatCow does try to do a lot of things well, but most of them aren’t what the majority of users are going to consider important. A2Hosting may do less, but it does everything incredibly well. As such, it’s very easy to pick a winner here – A2Hosting is simply a better value for your money on most counts.

What do you think about the hosts? Do you think that FatCow’s green solution is worth its problems? Do you think that the difficulty of users for A2Hosting should have played more of a factor? Let us know by getting in contact with us today!

(Visited 2 times, 1 visits today)

Leave a Response